Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:41
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is your best and worst childhood memory? What was your biggest fear as a child?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Jared Isaacman’s Plans For NASA - NASA Watch
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Country music singer opens up about HIV status, sexuality with release of new song - MassLive
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Can supporters of gun control explain the purpose behind a gun registry?
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Japanese Scientists Develop Artificial Blood Compatible With All Blood Types - Tokyo Weekender
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?